Eyad Bani-Melham views $2.5bn as small change.
“Jordan’s budget deficit is huge,” says Bani-Melham, a lawyer in Amman. “This new money is not going to make a difference.”
For Bani-Melhem, a pledge by Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to provide Jordan with $2.5bn in aid is not going to solve the kingdom’s unemployment problem, nor will it achieve social justice.
“When we took to the streets, we demanded social change and called for a system overhaul – we were not asking our country to plead for financial support,” he said.
New PM: Jordan ‘moving to withdrawing tax law’ after record protests
The 29-year-old is not alone. Thousands of other Jordanians also protested against price hikes and an income tax reform bill last week. They say the incoming aid will not “save” the country from its economic crisis and crippling debt.
The protesters called for a long-term fiscal plan, more transparency, an end to corruption, and more importantly – a complete overhaul of the government’s approach to economic and social policies.
While the latest pledge by the Gulf states may decrease some of the economic pressure facing Jordan’s new government, it move will likely not convince the masses that real change is imminent.
“In the past, Jordan received a similar aid package from the Gulf, but it didn’t have a positive or lasting effect,” Odai Nofal, who hails from the province of Zarqa, says.
“As citizens, we didn’t see a change in the government’s methodology that catered to the public’s needs,” the 28-year-old said. “All we saw was a bunch of austerity measures and so we’re rightfully concerned about seeing this pattern continue.”
Like Bani-Melham, Nofal was among the first to call on the recent protests in Jordan last month.
The biggest nationwide protests in years led to a cabinet reshuffle and a pledge by the country’s new Prime Minister, Omar al-Razzaz, to repeal the income tax bill that had been part of a series of IMF-backed reforms.
For a country that has long suffered from economic problems, and has historically been heavily reliant on foreign aid, Jordan’s economic reform measures stem from a $723m three-year credit line that it secured from the IMF in 2016.
Its public debt currently stands at about $30bn, which is why citizens such as 49-year-old Aroub Soubh say local and domestic changes are crucial at this stage.
“We must first sort out our internal affairs before seeking international support,” the activist and journalist says.
The Jordanians also want to reintroduce subsidies on bread and oil prices that were revoked earlier this year.
In 2018 alone, the cost of fuel has increased five times and electricity bills have shot up by 55 percent.
“People need to regain confidence in the government, especially when it comes to decision about economic policies that are due to be made soon,” Soubh said, explaining that the next few months will allow people to observe how the government plans to remedy its controversial austerity measures.
Laila Kloub agrees.
“The new government needs to depend on a national programme,” the 25-year-old writer says.
“It’s important for us citizens to feel like we have contributed in solving the crisis,” she adds, highlighting the need for a national plan.
For Kloub, a national plan will help the public know who needs to be held to account, and how.
Despite its “minimal” effect, Jordanian citizens say the five-year aid package does not come without “strings attached”.
Following the 2011 Arab uprisings, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) made a strategic decision to help the Jordanian and Moroccan monarchies with a five-year agreement worth over $5bn each. But this aid flow ended with the end of the Arab Spring and shifting alliances in the region.
Jordan unions launch nationwide strike over income tax plan
Its resumption today has led locals to believe their country, which is hosting more than 650,000 Syrian refugees, may be inclined to side with Saudi Arabia in regional conflicts.
“Nothing comes for free,” journalist Soubh says.
According to her, many who welcomed the latest aid pledge did so with “caution”.
“At least, for the first time, Jordanians feel they’ve established an open line of communication with Razzaz.”
Razzaz, who previously served as the outgoing government’s education minister, also pledged to engage in dialogue to reach consensus on a new tax law and economic reform.
Locals who took to the streets are hopeful that under his leadership, Razzaz would “finally” take serious steps to hold corrupt officials to account – a key demand for protesters.
With a diminishing middle class, people such as Nofal and Bani-Malham expect to see protests recommence in the next few months if the government’s approach remains unchanged.
The protests in Amman were organised and led by an independent group referred to as Hirak Shababi, or youth movement, as well as by various unions representing tens of thousands of employees across the country.
For now, “there are a few positive sings,” Bani-Melham says, referencing Razzaz’s pledge to repeal the income tax law.
“But we also need to see ministers and parliamentarians be paid more reasonable salaries … salaries that do not affect public money,” he says. “We need to collectively agree on what the best progressive tax rate should be.”
Whether these changes take place will depend on the new cabinet and parliament’s approval.
Though many Jordanians feel optimistic that Razzaz’s incoming government will answer to their demands, they also feel empowered by their ability to demonstrate and bring about change once again, if necessary.
“If our demands aren’t met, we will always have the fourth circle to return to,” they say, referring to the scene of the latest protests.
“But we hope this government meets, and exceeds our expectations.”
How can Jordan solve its economic crisis? | Counting the Cost